Home

Samaritan

THE LIFE AND DEATH AND LIFE OF BENJAMIN L. REYNOLDS

THIRTY-ONE

“Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. 22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, 23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things. 24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: 25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. 26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: 27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet. 28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; 29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, 30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful: 32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.” —Romans 1:21-32:

3Previous  200 Weeks  Print  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  Zion  Benediction  Close  Next4

I live in Colorado Springs,

ground zero of the Ted Haggard meth-and-gay-prostitute scandal, where, only weeks before, the black Christian community was shattered by Pastor Benjamin L. Reynolds' admission of his sexual orientation. Haggard's subsequent outing has thrust Reynolds into a national spotlight, making him, ironically, more famous and in greater demand as a speaker than at any other time in his ministry.

“I am a same-gender loving person,” Reynolds said on Friday, September 29th 2006 as he tendered his resignation as Senior Pastor of the Emmanuel Missionary Baptist Church in Colorado Springs, a stewardship he’d held for fifteen years. There was sobbing and shocked silence. The Emmanuel family, having long suspected as much, was stung nonetheless by this confirmation of their worst fear.

“I believe that this is who God has created me to be in His perfect wisdom,” Reynolds continued. “I do not repent because I cannot repent from an orientation that I was born with. I do, however, repent for not having had the courage to tell you sooner, for anyone that I have hurt or mislead, and more than that, I repent for not having trusted God enough to know that He never makes a mistake.”

And, now, the advice is: avoid. Now, suddenly, I’m supposed to pretend to not know this man whom I’ve known for more than a decade. Which is both hypocritical and absurd, since most of us suspected as much all along. To pretend to be shocked and appalled and roll around ripping our clothes and attacking the man now is beyond childish, and is damming evidence of a corrupt spiritual life, one that leverages appearance against sincerity as we cloak ourselves in man-made righteousness while completely missing the point of Jesus’ ministry.

I have simply given up trying to talk to church folk about gay issues because the fear is so deeply and generationally entrenched in our culture that simply bringing up the issue cranks up extreme anxiety. The only acceptable conversation one may have with church folk about gay issues is one that embraces unbridled disgust and loathing for same-gender loving people and advocates brainwashing and lives of isolation and shame. Even under the most benign circumstances, hatred and bigotry are only a breath away as the church struggles with this issue, an issue that strikes at our deepest fears and provokes our greatest response.




A Tale of Two Pastors
The Colorado Springs black Christian community has been rocked by Reynolds’s declaration, which was itself subsequently overshadowed by the sudden outing and subsequent confession of New Life Community Church Pastor Ted Haggard (right). A national figure as leader of the National Association of Evangelicals, Haggard led the charge against gay marriage and same-sex ballot initiatives and family values (i.e.: anti-gay) legislation before he was outed by an admitted gay prostitute for an alleged two-year affair and drug use, charges Haggard subsequently admitted were at least partially true. In the classic plank-in-your-own-eye lesson of Luke chapter 6, the white Christian community had been shaking its head about Reynolds’s situation just when they themselves were overcome with a much more heinous scandal on a much larger scale, a revelation made all the more ironic to the many members of Reynolds’ own church who had matriculated to New Life because they’d suspected Reynolds was gay.

The media being what it is, attempts were made to join the two events and two pastors—the leading black pastor in town and the leading white pastor in town—in scandal, which underscores the most tragic part of anti-gay bigotry: the assumption that all gay people are alike and that they all have negative or criminal qualities to them. This thinking is easily as wrongheaded as when all whites assume all blacks are stupid and lazy and less qualified than they are. Now, I know quite a few stupid, lazy blacks, but I also know quite a few stupid, lazy whites.

Since the tragic loss of his brother Bartone in 2002, Reynolds has become an increasingly outspoken advocate of equal rights for all persons—regardless of race, creed, or sexual orientation. Over time, his focus has shifted almost exclusively to the plight of the gay, lesbian and transgendered communities, where Reynolds has time and again placed himself and his reputation at risk in order to advocate for fair treatment to persons routinely dismissed by Christian society. Reynolds could have remained quietly in the closet, or he could have quietly withdrawn from his pastorate without making any personal declaration. But he chose instead to stand with these communities and take the hit, knowing full well the consequences of a public confession he was under no pressure to make,

Haggard, on the other hand, was frequently at the forefront of anti-gay initiatives while concealing an alleged history of drug use and homosexual conduct with a hired male escort. Haggard did not choose to come forward but was dragged into the light as part of failed cutthroat political maneuvering to pass same-sex ballot initiatives in the state.

Attempts to link the two situations, in any way, are simply unfair and make my case for the egregious-ness of gay bigotry. One situation has absolutely nothing to do with the other.




Attempts to examine scriptures dealing with homosexuality are met with suspicion and hostility, while scriptures endorsing slavery [Ephesians 6:5-9], condemning divorce and remarriage [Mark 10:11-12], and barring women from the pulpit [1 Timothy 2:11-14] are routinely examined and placed into a context that allows us to alter the conduct those scriptures deal with. I feel pressure to downplay my friendship with Reynolds even as my own church joyfully decks the halls with Christmas trees and lights and so forth—all of which I consider to be sinful emulation of pagan rituals and in clear violation of God’s law [I Cor 10:14, 20-21, Jer. 10:1-6, which explicitly warns against decorating trees].

Any attempts to examine scriptures dealing with gay issues are greeted with suspicion and hostility, rejecting even reasonable exegetical study in favor of a line-by-line literal reading, taken completely at face value, often out of context, and never examined beyond the surface of the text itself: homosexuality is a sin, homosexuals are sinners.

And I agree. Homosexuals are sinners. So are straight people. I believe the Bible. Every word of it. Without error. Without exception. Most especially the part that says we are all sinners [Romans 3:23] and that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners [1 Timothy 1:15]. Jesus gave His life for all of us. Straight and gay.
Holy Scripture calls a great many, many, many things sin. But we choose to seize on homosexuality as the greatest sin, which it is not (the greatest sin is the sin of blaspheming the Holy Spirit [Matthew 12:31]).

Sin is sin. There is no practical difference, in the eyes of God, between homosexual practice and your exceeding the speed limit as you rush to church. Both are sin. Both are punishable by death. And both are forgiven by the blood shed on Calvary. The difference, perhaps, being that exceeding the speed limit, gossiping, lying and divorce are all willful acts—as is homosexual practice. And it is important for us to make a distinction between the homosexual person and the homosexual act. At the end of the day, there should be no perceptible difference between a celibate straight man and a celibate gay man. Our complaint, as Christians, shouldn’t and really can’t logically be about someone’s sexual orientation. But God’s law should apply to everyone, equally and without diversion.

Gay people having sex outside of marriage are just as much in error as straight people having sex outside of marriage. God does not obligate or encourage us to fulfill our desires (straight or gay). Those desires that violate His laws must be controlled. The difference being that marriage is a covenant offered only to heterosexual couples, which therefore apparently restricts same-gender loving people to either lives of celibacy or lives of sin. This, to me, seems to be the principle struggle and challenge for gay Christians, who might find a little more acceptance from the church if they pledged themselves to eternal celibacy—to never act on their urges—which no other group of people are obligated to do.

The homosexual person, however, is another matter. The most credible stream of scientific thought today suggests that homosexuality is genetic, that people are simply born gay. And, if they are, the implication is that such a condition should be regarded as a consequence of birth, like blindness, deafness, nearsightedness, autism or other genetic defects. Gay people would likely be offended to be branded as “defective,” but we are all, in one way or another, defective. There simply are no perfect people on the planet. The Bible teaches us that sin came into the world through the first man [Romans 5:12] and imperfection—defects—entered the world through that rebellion.

There is no Biblical teaching that either confirms or contradicts that homosexuality is genetic. There is also no Biblical teaching that confirms or denies that the world is round and not flat. Just because the Bible does not specifically speak to an issue doesn’t necessarily make anything true or untrue.

But I have never met a man who just woke up one day and decided to be gay. Decided, all things being otherwise equal, that he would embrace a lifestyle that incites hatred and ostracization from family, friends, community and even God. Most gay people I’ve known arrived at the acceptance of their sexuality through extended periods of misery, isolation, denial, emotional pain and efforts to change. These people cried. These people suffered. Being gay, being hated and rejected, was the very last thing they ever wanted in their lives. Sin means, literally, “error.” The Biblical and empirical evidence before us is that God’s plan was for male and female, as there is no allowance for the propagation of the species based on single-gender relationships. However, I also believe God’s plan was for me to see without glasses, and for congenital paraplegics to walk.

But we don’t demand that nearsighted people see without glasses. We don’t demand paraplegics walk. We don’t call autism a lifestyle choice. We accept scientific evidence that suggests cerebral palsy is a birth defect (or, for that matter, that the Earth is not flat).

But homosexuality, no. No matter how much scientific evidence suggests otherwise, we selectively reject logic and science when it suits us. Which, by the way, is the textbook definition of bigotry. We hate these people because we want to hate them. We want to hate them because we fear them. We fear them, we see them as a threat because we’re afraid they might be us.

The net result is these people, who, as all people do, desperately need Christ, are turned away from the very thing they need most in their lives. If you’d grown up hearing only hate from the church, you'd develop a hatred for the church, too.

 

Other Peoples' Sin
So, does that mean we, as Christians, embrace homosexual practice and gay marriage? I’m not at a place where the morality of homosexual practice or gay marriage works for me. And I am perhaps splitting hairs between showing Christian love to homosexual persons while stopping short of endorsing homosexual practice (see my essay Witch Hunt for my reasons).

I don’t endorse homosexuality. I also don’t endorse autism, multiple sclerosis or cerebral palsy. I don’t endorse near-sightedness. I don’t endorse allergies and hay fever. I don’t endorse bad taste in clothes or tone deaf singing. I don’t believe any of these things are part of God’s plan. God’s plan for us, for mankind, was perfection. We messed that up. Imperfection came into the world when sin entered into the world. As a result, we are all born sinners—straight or gay. I can’t repent of my near-sightedness. I doubt Benjamin Reynolds can repent of his sexual orientation. But there will be no restoration for him until he repents of being born in sin. Repenting of being born in sin is what each of us needs to do, even though being born into a sinful state is completely beyond our control. And this is perhaps where my walk with Reynolds hits a fork in the road: I believe he should repent. I believe we should all repent. Reynolds's choice of language in his statement, “I do not repent...” is undoubtedly the inciting factor rallying the torch-bearing villagers of Colorado Springs. Beyond that, I believe we should all strive to be who God has ordained us to be. 45 years later, I’m still wearing glasses. But I’m on my way to heaven. And so is Benjamin L. Reynolds.

Reynolds has a master’s degree in divinity. I’m going to assume, therefore, that he’s seen a Bible and knows what’s in it. Having neither a heaven nor hell to offer him, I am content to preach what I believe to be true and let Benjamin— and Frank, Timmy, Angelo, Maria, Tenikah and Charlene— make their own choices and work out their own salvation [Phil. 2:12]. Condemning sin is one thing. Condemning people is God’s job.

Pretending I don’t know the man just makes me another two-faced phony bought off by other two-faced phonies who bang the Gay drum all day long while capriciously sentencing millions of young people to a life without hope, a life without God. Condemning same-gender loving people who are earnestly seeking God, who earnestly want to know Him and draw nearer to Him, while doing nothing—absolutely nothing—to engage at-risk youth is beyond criminal. If Focus, et. all., had even a marginal footprint in the black community, if they were doing even moderate work with our struggling churches (or, for that matter, if the Over-Fed, Cadillac-with-fake-tire-on-trunk LayAbout Pastors Club in the black church would get off their collective fat rear ends and commit their resources to making true disciples of Christ rather than competing for the same dwindling handful of big hat church folk), I'd perhaps be more on board with their conservative agenda.

Look, I’m never going to change your mind. You’re going to believe whatever you believe. But if you read the book, there’s a whole bunch more sins than homosexuality. At the very least, you can be brave enough to condemn all sin—including the sin we don't want to talk about. Beating up gays is safe. It scores political points. It rallies the troops. And it seems to talk about sin without actually talking about sin because it is Other Peoples' Sin. Getting all righteous about Other Peoples' Sin is easy. If we were really talking about actual sin instead of pretend sin, we’d talk about the truer abomination among us: the gross infestation of sin in our Christian lives.

When I get perfect, when I am morally and ethically and genetically without flaw, I’ll throw the first rock at Benjamin Reynolds. Short of that, condemning him is God’s business, not mine.




Avoiding Samaria
By their own doctrine of eternal security, conservative Baptists are forced to admit that Benjamin Reynolds is born again. Whether you believe him right or wrong, saint or sinner, by their own yardstick, we must accept the fact Benjamin Reynolds is on his way to heaven. If Reynolds can now go places we refuse to go and speak to people we refuse to speak to and tell these folk about Jesus, I’d dare say that’s a good thing. A true relationship with Jesus Christ is bound to straighten out what’s bent about you. As the Holy Spirit indwells within you and sanctifies and delivers you from sinful deeds, thoughts and habits, God will reveal all truth to you [John 15:26]. We so-called Christians don’t seem to trust that process in that many of us would not ever preach at a church that openly accepts gays without salting our message with anti-gay sentiment. We act as the children of Israel did in Jesus’ time, scrupulously avoiding the cursed town of Samaria.

In the days of Christ, the animosity between the Jews and the Samaritans was so great that Jews routinely avoided passing through Samaria when they traveled between Galilee and Judea. They went an extra distance through the barren land of Perea on the eastern side of the Jordan to avoid going through Samaria. Yet Jesus rebuked His disciples for their hostility towards the Samaritans [Luke 9:55-56], healed a Samaritan leper [Luke 17:16], honored a Samaritan for his hospitality [Luke 10:30-37], praised a Samaritan for his gratitude [Luke 17:11-18], asked a drink of a Samaritan woman [John 4:7], and preached to the Samaritans [John 4:40-42]. Then, in Acts 1:8, Jesus challenged His disciples to witness in Samaria. Phillip, a deacon, opened a mission there [Acts 8:5].

These were people considered, by the church folk of the day, to be ceremonially unclean. These were sinners. Outcasts. Hated and unwelcome by God’s people. Now, substitute the word Homosexual for the word Samaritan. We won’t talk to them. We won’t touch them. We won’t eat with them. I’d better be careful what I write, here. What I say. Who I’m seen with. What church I preach at. Lord help me if I preach at a church that welcomes Samaritans.

 

Throwing Stones
My favorite sermon of the moment is Reynolds’ “A Great Door Is Opened Unto Me,” taken from 1st Corinthians wherein Pastor Reynolds preaches about effectiveness and purpose in ministry. He alludes to the meaning of time and place, in that the Apostle Paul worked fruitlessly in Ephesus for three long years before he started to see results from his efforts. Reynolds suggests God will put us in a place that may not make sense to us now but that fits perfectly with God’s plan, and that God has a way of changing seasons such that our efforts, which seemed futile, suddenly become relevant and effective. It is a sermon I know almost word-for-word and it is, in many ways, a mantra for my own Christian walk.

Does Reynolds’s sexual orientation now negate that message, rendering it void? Should it? The hot-button issue of homosexuality likely shudders many minds closed on the issue of Reynolds’ pastorate, and, seemingly, all of the enormous good and progressive teaching and all of the spiritual and intellectual ground gained by Emmanuel under his tenure has likely been quickly written off by those whose disposition is simply that nothing a gay man does has any lasting value to the kingdom of Heaven.

That notion is inconsistent with scripture. Regardless of your position on these issues, regardless of whether you believe Reynolds saint or sinner, Jesus taught, in Mark Chapter 9, that works done in Christ’s name speak for themselves and endure forever.

“Teacher,’ said John, “we saw a man driving out demons in your name and we told him to stop, because he was not one of us.” “Do not stop him,” Jesus said. “No one who does a miracle in my name can in the next moment say anything bad about me, for whoever is not against us is for us.”

The measure of a church’s success, as Pastor Reynolds points out, is not head count but that church’s effectiveness. How many lives changed? How many hungry fed? How many naked clothed? That we succeed or fail is in the hands of the Lord, it is our willingness, our desire to please Him that pleases Him.

Reynolds has invested a great deal of himself in attempting to raise the standard of ministry and worship in the black church, including a more enlightened and informed view of the very complex issues of human sexuality.

These efforts have earned Emmanuel a reputation as the standard bearer for excellence in ministry in the black church here, but that reputation has also been often overshadowed by rumors about Reynolds’s sexual orientation and divisive episodes such as Reynolds’ welcoming a lesbian evangelist and accepting a van for the assistance and relief of Hurricane Katrina survivors from the Gay and Lesbian Fund.

Reynolds has stubbornly refused to change course or quiet down about these issues. “I’m not going to back off of this,” he said. “It may get me killed, but somebody has got to stand up for what’s right.”

Reynolds’ truest and most unequivocal lesson to us is that bigotry, by any other name, is still bigotry. As Christians, especially as black Christians, we of all people certainly understand bigotry and hatred. We, of all people, should be the last to practice it.

Reynolds’ insistence on an open-door, whosoever-will policy for Emmanuel cast him in a controversial light and forced the Emmanuel membership to choose between simple acceptance of traditional bias or difficult and often painful self-examination of our motives and practices.

“This may be a surprise to some of you; but be assured that it is no surprise to God,” Reynolds concluded. “God knew when he called me, that He would use me for such a time as this.”

Christopher J. Priest
3 December 2006
editor@praisenet.org
DISCUSS THIS ESSAY

TOP OF PAGE
Text Copyright © 2008 PraiseNet eMedia Except As Noted. All Rights Reserved. 

3Previous  200 Weeks  Print  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  Zion  Benediction  Close  Next4